New Incentives to Retire Early - Government will offset Employers Paying Continued Health Care Costs

The Obama Administration reports today that they will subsidize employers who are providing medical benefits to "early retirees".  The issue is that Medicare kicks in at age 65.  Given the costs of private health insurance, older, and sometimes most highly compensated, employees are delaying their retirement because they can't afford to fully privately pay health care until age 65.  In order to incentivize these employees to retire early, a practice had been for an employer to continue medical coverage until age 65.  However, upward spiraling premiums have made this practice potentially uneconomic.  So here we are, employees can't afford to retire due to health care costs, and employers can't afford to offer retirement packages due to health care costs. 

The proposed solution is that is employers will now have an opportunity to be reimbursed for some of the health care premiums they add to retirement packages.  At its heart then, this is a job stimulus measure.  If older more experienced employees retire, it creates room for mid-level employees to move into new jobs (presumably at a lower salary) and frees up lower end opportunities for those out of work or moving into the workforce.

Effective next month, federal subsidies will allow employers to recoup a big chunk of the cost of medical claims for retirees ages 55 to 64 not yet eligible for Medicare, according to a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of the official announcement expected Tuesday.


Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Hank520 - May 5, 2010 6:01 PM

I am almost 63, and I "retired" from Raytheon 2 months ago because of a lack of interest in Missile Defense. I was not given any offer of continued Health Care coverage other than the Standard COBRA package which offered to allow me and my family to continued coverage if I pay the full rate (previously paid my former employer plus my contribution). That amount (>$16k/year) I cannot afford so now I'm both "retired" and have no health insurance.

My question is if this new Program just mentioned in the 4 May 2010 article could or will had any positve effect on my situation? or is it too early to really tell, since there seems to be a lot of rhetoric flying around these days.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.

Remember personal info?